Presence of HPV in Oral Lesions and Its Relation with Tumor Suppressor Genes in the Way to Find New Strategies to Prevent Oral Cancer

Objectives: The oral infection by human papillomavirus (HPV) is considered a direct cause of squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the correlation between HPV infection and the oncogenic progression of oral lesions and to assess the tumor regulation mechanisms that are activated following infection. Material and methods: a histological and immunohistochemical study of 50 selected samples from our files was conducted, in which the expression of the adhesion protein E-cadherin, the proliferation marker Ki67, the tumor suppressor proteins p16 and p21 and the tumor suppressor gene p53 were assessed. Results: HPV infection causes changes in the normal cell cycle of infected tissue and cytological changes. Through its mitogenic power that increases cell activity and activates cellular proliferation. The p53 tumor suppressor gene activates the p21 tumor inhibitory protein. Overexpression of tumor inhibitory p16 occurs simultaneously with p21 overexpression. Conclusion: The results support previous studies showing that HPV has mitogenic power and its presence activates cell mechanisms that control cell proliferation and inhibit progression to cancer.p16ink4a determined by immunohistochemistry allows differentiating high or low-risk lesions. We believe in the benefits of oral HPV type screening and vaccination.


Introduction
Cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx is the 11th most common cancer worldwide [1]. 25-35% of cases are believed to be associated with HPV, specifically palatine tonsils and the base of the tongue [2]. The incidence has increased in the last 30 years [2], which could be due to the effects of HPV. In 2007, the International Centre for Cancer Research estimated that 31% of squamous cancers of the oral cavity and oropharynx are attributable to HPV16; this number increases to 39% in western and northern Europe [3]. However, a distinction should be made between different regions, as in southern Europe fewer than 20% are HPV related, but in North America, 60% are HPV associated [4].
HPV is a small-sized epitheliotropic double-stranded DNA virus [5] and is composed of a protein capsid in which the genome of double-stranded nucleic acid can be found. It has no wrapping [5]. The early region is composed of the E (early) genes. Six early genes are known: E1, E2, E4, E5, E6, and E7. The late region is composed of the L (late) genes. Two late genes are known: L1 and L2. They are expressed in the late stages of the viral cycle and their function is to encode the structural proteins that form the capsid.
Approximately 30 types of HPV infect mucous membranes, whether nasopharyngeal, oral or genital [6]. These viruses are divided into three other groups according to their neoplastic potential: high, intermediate and low risk [4]. The genotypes considered to be of low risk are 2, 6,11,13,43,44 [7]. It should be noted that the oncogenic potential of each genotype varies, despite expressing the same oncoproteins [8]. The most common low-risk subtypes are 6 and 11 [9].
In high-risk HPV16 and HPV18 types, E6 and E7 proteins can induce immortalisation of keratinocytes, which is partly due to the interaction of HPV16 E7 with certain proteins, especially pRB (the product of the retinoblastoma gene) which plays an essential role in the control of the cell cycle since it regulates the activity of various transcription factors (E2F) [10].
The cell cycle control is mediated by a small group of proteins, including the tumor suppressor protein p16ink4a, which binds to CDKs and inhibits their kinase activity (inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases; CDKI). Therefore, ectopic expression of p16ink4a leads to the accumulation of hypophosphorylated Rb, sequestration of E2F and consequently arrest of G1. The Rb protein imposes negative control on p16, so the functional inactivation of pRb by any means leads to the overexpression of p16 and therefore to the activation of the p16/cyclin D/ CDK4/regulatory pRb cascade of the cell cycle [11].
The interaction of HPV16 E7 with pRb causes the release of active E2F and stimulation of S-phase entry, even in the absence of active CDK4 and CDK6 complexes and in the presence of high levels of p16ink4a, which indicates that the suppressor function of p16 can be overcome by viral oncogenes. Thus, the overexpression of p16 that would have stopped the cell cycle under normal conditions has no effect, since pRb has been previously blocked by E7.
Inactivation of p16 regulatory function is seen in the very early stages of the oncogenic progression of HPV, but not during late malignant transformation, whereas the expression of E6/E7 has only been confirmed by in situ hybridization in severe dysplasia or oral carcinoma [12].
p16ink4a [11] can be demonstrated immunohistochemically, showing a different staining pattern depending on the infection due to high or low-risk genotypes, regardless of the type of epithelial lesion.
The efficacy of p16 immunostaining is beyond doubt [13,14], considering that in the basal state, it is not expressed in non-dysplastic cells. Almost 100% of squamous cell carcinomas and severe epithelial dysplasia associated with HPV AR overexpress p16 diffusely, although not all cases that show overexpression of p16 are HPV positive. It indicates that there are unknown pathways of activation independent to HPV. Negative or weakly immunostaining has been described in adenocarcinomas not associated with HPV, suggesting that the dysregulation of this protein may be related in their etiology.

Material and Methods
50samples were randomly selected, without knowing their diagnosis. All of them were histologically and immunohistochemically analyzed providing a diagnosis based on the expression of the following parameters: p16, Ki67, p21, p53, and E-cadherin. Finally, it was found to include 17 benign, 21 premalignant and 12 malignant lesions (Table 1). Class III: Overexpresses p16 and HPV positive. This one has the highest viral load, nevertheless, survival at 5 years is 79%.

Frequency
Class IV: Over expresses p16 but negative for HPV. These tumors represent a small percentage and may arise for two reasons: overexpression of p16 is due to other routes or by another infectious agent, or it is a misclassification as being negative due to insufficient sensitivity of the test performed.
HPV negative tumors that overexpress p16 have a better prognosis than those that do not overexpress p16.

Patient and Public Involvement
This study has been carried out on paraffin blocks stored in our institution, without causing any type of damage to the tissue studied. Each patient, before being operated on, compulsorily signs an informed consent for the possible application of their tissue for research purposes, without prejudice to the diagnosis, which is the fundamental objective of the biopsy. Once our study was completed, a complementary report was attached to the initial pathological report, which is sent to the doctor in charge of each patient to inform them of the result.  5 weak reactivity was found in the cytoplasm and nuclei of proliferating fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and some inflammatory cells.
All samples have been tested with HC2 high-risk RNA.
The HC2 probes detect 13 high-risk genotypes. The test was done per package insert. Three negative controls, one low-risk HPV, one high-risk HPV, and three positive calibrators were included in each assay run.

Statistical assessment
We aimed to find a statistically significant relationship between the analyzed variables. Seven variables were assessed, two quantitative (Ki67 and p53) and five qualitative (sex, diagnosis, p16, p21, and E-cadherin). E-cadherin provided positive results in all cases, thus was excluded from the study.
We studied the distribution of the two quantitative variables (Ki67 and p53) through the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, under the null hypothesis of normality.
To assess differences between the means of the quantitative variables with respect to the other variables and after knowing that their distributions did not conform to normality, we used the Mann-Whitney U test.
Given that the main objective of the study was to find a relationship of dependence between the oncoprotein p16 and the other variables, we performed a conversion to be able to apply the chi-squared test for dichotomous qualitative variables.
Subsequently, we performed a bivariate analysis of the hypothesis with the chi-squared test under the null hypothesis of independence.

Results
The histological diagnosis was made following the WHO histological classification; however, we summarized them in three groups, as seen in Table I A relationship of dependence of p21 protein with p16, p53 and Ki67 was also found. The relationship between p21 and p53 was clear since p53 can activate p21. The relationship between p21 and Ki67 can also be explained since the function of p21 is to inhibit the uncontrolled proliferation of cells by stopping them in the G1 phase; therefore, an increase in the cell proliferation index will lead to overexpression of p21 as shown in Table 3.
We found positive staining for p16 in both malignant and benign lesions, but when we analyzed the relationship between p16 and p21, the p-value was <0.05, so we rejected the null hypothesis of independence of the variables and accepted the alternative dependency hypothesis, which means there is a relationship between p16 and p21.
The overexpression of p16 ( Figure 1) related to the histological diagnosis showed a wide distribution, with considerable presence of p16 in benign lesions.
We found completely overall concordance and positive concordance rates between p16 ink4a immunostaining and Hybrid Capture ® 2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test™ (hc2) assays.

Discussion
The study raised several questions: is it possible that the After carrying out this study and interpreting the results, we can confirm that the presence of actively replicating virus activates a series of tumor inhibitory proteins whose objective is to stop the uncontrolled cell division that can lead to cancer.
Specifying and referring to the dependency relationships found among different proteins, we found the following:    The diagnosis presents a clear relationship of dependence with the proteins Ki67 and p53, which supports previous studies. Cells that suffer from indiscriminate mitosis have damaged cellular DNA, unlike cells from tissues with benign lesions.
The p53 tumor suppressor gene is involved in DNA repair, explaining its overexpression in the cells that require its activity.
A dependency relationship was found between p21 protein and p16, p53 and Ki67. p21 and p53 relation were clear since p53 has the ability to activate p21. p21 and Ki67 relation might be explained taking into account that the objective of p21 is to stop the uncontrolled proliferation of cells, stopping them in the G1 phase; therefore, an increase in the cell proliferation index will lead to the overexpression of p21. The relationship between p21 and p16, both responsible for stopping the cell in the G1 phase, shows that the presence of HPV in a state of replication sets in motion cellular mechanisms that inhibit tumors.
With these results, we can confirm that the HPV infection of the oral cavity tissue has set in motion cellular mechanisms for tumor inhibitors, so this infection has a direct rela-7 tionship with cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx [17]. The literature reviewed shows a causal relationship between HPV and carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx, stating that 30% of squamous tumors are caused by this virus [18]. Some studies [7], claim that the increased incidence of this type of cancer is mainly due to HPV infection, while others (9), have raised the possibility of including prevention plans. It should also be noted that some studies have shown a low oncogenic prevalence of HPV in the oral cavity [19]. Since the causal relationship between HPV and oral cancer has been demonstrated, we suggest that simple screening performed by swabbing the oral cavity would help with early treatment and surveillance to prevent the development of oral cancer. The inclusion of serotypes with the greater oral tendency in established vaccination campaigns could reduce the incidence of this cancer.
Since men are often carriers of the virus and the main transmitter to women, their inclusion in the current vaccination campaign would reduce the number of infections and thus reduce the risk of HPV-associated cancer. It would be interesting to investigate the probability of developing cancer in the oral cavity if there is an infection in this location, in order to analyze whether the costs incurred by screening and vaccination against specific oral serotypes would be useful, or whether a low probability would be a waste of public money. To conclude, the results of this study provide very interesting information and highlight possible advantages and disadvantages of HPV vaccination, since the possibility of reducing the incidence and consequent morbidity and mortality of cancer that is increasing its incidence is an excellent incentive.